lurkerwithout: (Silence)
Finished the third episode from Season 1 for the BBC show yesterday. And I can most definitely say that the CBS one is the superior show. Sherlock isn't terrible in any way, but it doesn't have the character depth Elementary does. Actually, I take part of that back. In one way the former is a little terrible. The mystery in each episode is ludicrously overcomplicated...

But beyond that compare Sherlock, Watson and Moriarty from the two shows. Cumberbatch is an overgrown kid. Yes, hes fun to watch but there isn't really much else there. Jonny Lee's Sherlock is full of depth. Pain and damage and brilliance and halting, stumbling attempts at emotional growth and repair...

The two Watson's are pretty even. But the relationship they have with Sherlock less so. Bilbo Watson meets Sherlock finds him neat and infuriating at the same time and then four and a half hours later is willing to die for the dude. WHY? Joan and Sherlock though. You see their relationship evolve over time, one difficult step at a time. And so scenes like the naming of the bee carry so much more weight to them in the CBS series...

And finally Moriarty. BBC Moriarty is a giddy Joker. A cruel mad criminal genius. Which, again, fun but shallow. The CBS Moriarty though. The reveal on this character is a huge dramatic gut punch. And you're left seeing that there is a real person at the end. One with human motivations and goals. Not just comic book super-villainy...

Perhaps its the larger canvas that lets Elementary really blossom or maybe Moffat and the others are just shallower writers. Either way, Sherlock is a B- mystery show and Elementary is an A+ drama...
lurkerwithout: (Silence)
Or Sharpe vs. the Expliotation of the Working Class. This one is entirely made for the BBC series I think. Including the unexpected half-brother. Though the bits with Rossendale and Sharpe's wife are from the books. I did like seeing Alexis Denisof as Rossendale...
lurkerwithout: (Death)
It wasn't just re-casting Twoflower as an "American". I mean that was a big part of why this adaptation felt so off. But it wasn't just that. Though I did enjoy the brief moments of Jeromy Irons as Vetinari. Even though the threats made by the Patrician are pretty clumsy for the character, especially as they were meant to be coming from someone based on the latter book's more developed version...

Maybe it will be like the BBC Hogfather and it will grow on me if I watch it again. Or not...
lurkerwithout: (Silence)
You know I've probably seen more happy endings in British lesbian romances and dramas then American ones. American ones nearly always seem to end with break-ups, fleeing town or suicides...
lurkerwithout: (Silence)
While some of the techie stereotypes were a bit over the top still an enormously funny show. Along with Spaced one of the few BBC comedies that lives up to the praise for it. I especially liked Richmond the Goth, if only because I'm pretty sure I've pretended to be a vampire with the guy...

Neverwhere

Aug. 1st, 2009 12:23 pm
lurkerwithout: (Silence)
The BBC adaptation of the Gaiman book. As always with BBC productions the FX fall under the less is more rule. But it still captures the somewhat otherworldly feel for London Below. And the various actors do a fine job of capturing the feel of the characters. Especially Richard, Carabas, Mr. Croup and Vandemere, Hunter and Islington. Though for some reason they changed the Beast of London from a boar to a bull...
lurkerwithout: (Borg cat)
*Laughs and laughs at 90% of Dr.Who fandom losing its shit*

Hey at least they made the risky and cutting edge decision to recast a middle aged white guy with a twenty something white guy...

Father Ted

Jul. 5th, 2008 03:07 pm
lurkerwithout: (Silence)
Well that was definitely television. Yep. Thats a sitcom all right. Maybe later seasons have more of that amazing humor I heard about? Because this one is pretty average. Nothing terrible really. But nothing that really makes it better (or worse) than your average American sitcom...
lurkerwithout: (Obey me eyes)
A decent enough adaptation, though it falls into the normal pitfalls of 80s BBC scifi. That is the special effects budget was probably in the single digits and the acting is so laid back the actors seem to be taking a nap in many cases. So far, I've yet to see or hear about an adaptation that really manages to capture the first four books. That is the good books in the series...

I do like this version of Marvin though...

Hex

May. 28th, 2007 03:00 am
lurkerwithout: (Obey me eyes)
Marathon on BBC America is now ended. Odd to see the central character of a show change partway into the season. Stupid cliffhanger ending. Also I think I'm done with lesbian ghosts for awhile.

...

Thats a lie.

Television needs more lesbian ghosts...
lurkerwithout: (Puss in boots)
This episode probably departs the most from the original book. Ditching the entire Navy/Army confict. But still it has Fredrick's, the ugliest English officer in all of creation. And Harper yanking out his OWN rotten tooth with a pair of pliers as part of a ruse. Also for the 5th or 6th time, a noble who is supposed to be on the British side, but who is a spy for Bonaparte...

I mean if this were an rpg I were playing in, I'd just gut every "friendly" noble I get introduced to.

"Major meet the Count De.."

SLASH STAB HACK

"Major!"

"What? He was a spy. They're ALWAYS spies!"
lurkerwithout: (Puss in boots)
Richard Sharpe is caught up in a game of spy and counterspy with a beautiful young nun caught in the middle. Can the legendary British sol...wait...is that Mark Antony? Holy crap! It is James Purefoy. And Sir Henry Simonson again? That slimy little weasel!

Profile

lurkerwithout: (Default)
lurkerwithout

March 2019

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 13th, 2025 09:24 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios