This one goes out to ![[profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
spoonyone
Sep. 26th, 2008 01:41 am
This one goes out to
Sep. 26th, 2008 01:41 am
Roger Ebert is bitchrod awesome
Sep. 24th, 2008 06:43 amQ. Yo dude, u missed out on "Disaster Movie," a hardcore laugh-ur-@zz-off movie! Y U not review this movie!? It was funny as #ell! Prolly the funniest movie of the summer! U never review these, wat up wit dat?
S.J. Stanczak, Chicago
A. Hey, bro, I wuz buzier than $#i+, @d they never shoed it b4 hand. I peeped in the IMDb and saw it zoomed to #1 as the low$ie$t flic of all time, wit @ lame-@zz UZer Rating of 1.3. U liked it? Wat up wit dat?
Do you think having suffered a stroke makes l33t easier or harder?
There is no way to please people who have already made up their mind about you, so I've stopped trying. Feminists, WoC, whatever PC label you want to put on your perpetual nitpicking to make it seem like you possess a moral high ground that can somehow be substituted for actual reasoning: You do great shame to your cause by being so willfully close-minded and emotional. Not once, not twice, but just about EVERY SINGLE TIME I've posted an opinion that DARED not fall in line with the femi-comics-bloggers' groupthink, I'm instantly labeled a troll, attacked personally, and then dismissed out of hand.
Oh you poor, poor man. The way we all pointed out your generalizations about soldiers in WW2 were inaccurate. HOW CRUEL OF US! Emotionally cruel!
Good grief. Its a shame that a good idea can be so botched when put into practice. But I shouldn't be surprised, its the exact same thing that happened with libertarians. Libertarianism is a noble idea whose proponents just happen to by hypocritical assholes when you actually talk with them. And I was about ready to put feminists in this category too when I realized these people aren't real feminists any more than someone advocating the end of ALL taxes is a real libertarian.
This part was just for my Lib friends. You hear that
scarybaldguy, dunkelza. I always suspected you of this. ALWAYS!Sincerely,
The "Troll" (a label so original and creative, it just smacks of proof that female writers are being discriminated against regularly)
What? No seriously, what the hell is he trying to say there?
PS: For you-know-who... I'm gonna pass on the offer to fuck you as your personality leaves more than a little to be desired, and from the tone of your writing we already know where you stand in the looks department.
I think that last one was directed at you
morchades. Because thats how physical beauty is determined. Writing tone...Still need a nickname for him. I think I'll just steal from Ami and call him The Flouncer. Stay strong The Flouncer!
Someone doesn't like me
Dec. 11th, 2007 04:14 amWhen some attention whoring feminist cuntrag devotes an entire Blogpost to how everyone else should be ignoring you?
I mean I dont expect them to be consistant from day to day, but you'd think even a feeble minded, sex deprived, ugly as sin, and as fat as texas, misadrist, lesbian, harpy can be consistant with themselves in the space of a single post. Wouldn't you?
I know, I know. I'm failing at ignoring his monkey antics again. But really its a slow period at work. So lets break down some of his insults...
"attention whoring": This is true. I love when people pay attention to me. I can't help it. I'm the most important person there is, so its vital others rank me in their thoughts accordingly....
"feminist": Well I do treat women in the same manner as I do men. I guess that makes me a feminist.
"cuntrag": I don't think I've ever been used to clean a vagina or as any kind of tampon. So we'll just call that one a baseless slur...
"Blogpost": This is a journal. I never post anything on my Blog. I created it to comment on others Blogs and then Blogger went and made it so you could use your G-Mail account as a default...
"feeble minded": Easily distracted by shiny objects sure. But enfeebled? Though my memory is for crap on a lot of areas lately...
"sex deprived": Does at count as deprived when you're not trying? I mean ANYONE can get laid if they're willing to put forth the effort. But there always seems to be so many other things I'd rather do than engage in the quest for nookie. Still I guess its true on a technical level...
"ugly as sin": I'll have you know my mom says I'm very handsome. So nyah!
"fat as texas": Oh come now. Thats just plain hyperbole. Fat as Austin I'd allow, but the WHOLE state?
"misadrist": I don't hate men. Or maybe I do? I mean his online handle has man in it. And I do dislike him. And there ARE people I hate. And some of them ARE men. Oh no! Its true! All you men, off my f-list! Get! Only ladies from now on. Also this journal is going clothing optional...
"lesbian": Weeeeeell I am in favor of as much girl-on-girl action as possible. Added wherever and whenever. I mean it has passed the normal guy reaction of "girl makeouts = hawt" and is probably at the fetish point. But still there is that whole having a penis thing. But its not a very big penis. Maybe they'll let me in the club if I promise to buy more than one k.d. lang album. I do have TWO Jill Sobule albums. Maybe if I get some Melissa Ethridge?
"harpy": Oh come now. Have you even READ the Monster Manual? I don't have wings. I lack a charm attack. And my man-boobs are plentiful but not covered in soft down...
Oh wait, this needs some comics discussion to be on subject in case it gets linked. Let me think...
Crap! Can't think of anything. Damn feeble mindedness! Have some pretty pictures instead...
Some Empowered...
And some Nightcrawler...
Oooh! Some ps238 Zodon!
I should know better
Sep. 23rd, 2007 05:31 amSo thanks to the When Fangirls Attack linkblog I once again attempted to read some posts by Mad 360 Scott. No I'm not providing him with a link. If you want to share my headache, you can find him pretty easily on your own. And as always I regret it...
1st he has a "humorous" piece on the Marvel Adventures: Avengers issue that guest stars the Agents of A.T.L.A.S. And his "funny" point is that its sexist because it has Namora in it. And her original Golden Age comics had some sexist tropes in them. Er...ok? I think his "joke" is that comics fandom feminist's can find sexism anywhere so really there isn't any and aren't they silly? I don't know. Maybe he actually thinks the comic is sexist and is harmful to kids? Except even he says its supposed to be funny....
Then on his regular Yahoo blog he shows that his weird statistics (which mostly consist of just throwing up bunches of meaningless numbers and lists) that "disprove" comics misogny don't bother him when he uses them to "disprove" anti-gay trends in comics. And he's gay so he CAN'T be anti-gay. Because he founded a Gay League thing about comics, even though he then admits that he frequently disagrees with the other people who founded the group because he "disproves" homophobia in comics. Or something. Honestly my eyes start glazing over whenever I try to read his arguements...
Plus he takes a mild, but cheap, shot atpomobarney for only doing silly posts on comics and never "serious" discussion on gay themes on his blog. Except of course that he does. And in fact the most recent was a fairly serious gay-themed post. Plus he's start up the Comic Gays linkblog for gay issues in comics, sci fi and fantasy...
So basically, I KNEW his posts would make me angry. KNEW I'd just get upset and it will potentially lead to internet drama. And I still I clicked through. My theory is that I'm an idjit and enjoy mental pain. Oh well, another excuse to use the Puppet Angel icon...
Edit: And Scott you've got your own blog to argue with people. Thanks for making it so I had to look up the ban function for the first time in 3+ years. Learn to deal with an near anonymous stranger on the internet not liking you...
1st he has a "humorous" piece on the Marvel Adventures: Avengers issue that guest stars the Agents of A.T.L.A.S. And his "funny" point is that its sexist because it has Namora in it. And her original Golden Age comics had some sexist tropes in them. Er...ok? I think his "joke" is that comics fandom feminist's can find sexism anywhere so really there isn't any and aren't they silly? I don't know. Maybe he actually thinks the comic is sexist and is harmful to kids? Except even he says its supposed to be funny....
Then on his regular Yahoo blog he shows that his weird statistics (which mostly consist of just throwing up bunches of meaningless numbers and lists) that "disprove" comics misogny don't bother him when he uses them to "disprove" anti-gay trends in comics. And he's gay so he CAN'T be anti-gay. Because he founded a Gay League thing about comics, even though he then admits that he frequently disagrees with the other people who founded the group because he "disproves" homophobia in comics. Or something. Honestly my eyes start glazing over whenever I try to read his arguements...
Plus he takes a mild, but cheap, shot at
pomobarney for only doing silly posts on comics and never "serious" discussion on gay themes on his blog. Except of course that he does. And in fact the most recent was a fairly serious gay-themed post. Plus he's start up the Comic Gays linkblog for gay issues in comics, sci fi and fantasy...So basically, I KNEW his posts would make me angry. KNEW I'd just get upset and it will potentially lead to internet drama. And I still I clicked through. My theory is that I'm an idjit and enjoy mental pain. Oh well, another excuse to use the Puppet Angel icon...
Edit: And Scott you've got your own blog to argue with people. Thanks for making it so I had to look up the ban function for the first time in 3+ years. Learn to deal with an near anonymous stranger on the internet not liking you...
